Prediction of Iveta Dapkute [754th] vs Sana Garakani [] Head-to-Head At The
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L L W L W W L L L
Form
W W L W W L L L L LHead-To-Head: Dapkute 1 - 0 Garakani
They have played 2 sets in total, with Dapkute winning 2 and Garakani winning 0. The last match between Dapkute and Garakani was at the W35 Lousada, 24-11-2024, Q1 round, I.hard with Iveta Dapkute getting the victory 6-1 6-1.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Iveta Dapkute | 1 |
| Sana Garakani | 0 |
| Dapkute | Stats | Garakani |
|---|---|---|
| 41% (7-10) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 754 | Ranking | N/A |
| 728 | Highest Rank | |
| 32 | Age | 21 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 0 | Titles | 0 |
| 53% (105-93) | Career Total W/L | 30% (21-50) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 0 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 1 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-1 | |||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 2 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Return Points Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Iveta Dapkute vs Sana Garakani Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Dapkute 1 - 0 Garakani
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Dapkute has won 36.28% of points on their second serve, while Garakani has won 34.62%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Dapkute, in recent form, has won 53.44% of their opponent's second serve points, while Garakani has won 50%. The same stats for first serve returns are 31.83% and 35.29% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Dapkute has saved 50.46% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Garakani has saved 50% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Dapkute has won 50% of matches played (W/L 24/ 24), with Garakani winning 31.25% (W/L 5/ 11) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Dapkute has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 55% (W/L 49/ 40), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 50% (W/L 30/ 30). Garakani has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 36% (W/L 4/ 7), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 23% (W/L 3/ 10).
- Player level: In the last year, Dapkute has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 52.78% of matches (W/L 19/ 17), where as Garakani has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 5/ 5). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Dapkute winning 1 times and Garakani being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Dapkute winning 2 and Garakani winning 0. The last match between Dapkute and Garakani was at the W35 Lousada, 24-11-2024, Q1 round, I.hard with Iveta Dapkute getting the victory 6-1 6-1.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Dapkute and Garakani have played a deciding set 0 times, with Dapkute winning 0 times and Garakani 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Dapkute winning 0, and Garakani 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Dapkute has played against opponents with an average rank of 372.98 while Garakani has played against players with an average rank of 255.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Dapkute has won 75% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Garakani has won 38% in all matches played on tour.
- Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Dapkute has converted 46.59% of breakpoint opportunities, and Garakani has converted 50% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Iveta Dapkute vs Sana Garakani Best Odds For The Match
Iveta Dapkute Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 |
Stats 
Polina Kaibekova
Player
Iveta Dapkute
69%
(
41 of
59)
1st Serve %
63%
(
46 of
73)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
59%
(
24 of
41)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
46%
(
27 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
38 of
73)
70
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Angelica Blake
Player
Iveta Dapkute
86%
(
30 of
35)
1st Serve %
59%
(
22 of
37)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
87%
(
26 of
30)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
40%
(
2 of
5)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
7 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
51
Total Points Won
21
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniela Piani
Player
Iveta Dapkute
64%
(
37 of
58)
1st Serve %
71%
(
56 of
79)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
28 of
56)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
38%
(
22 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
38 of
79)
74
Total Points Won
63
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Iveta Dapkute
Player
Carola Cavelli
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve %
53%
(
29 of
55)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
8
65%
(
22 of
34)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
5 of
26)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
40%
(
21 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
33 of
55)
65
Total Points Won
43
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-1 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Maria Kalyakina
Player
Iveta Dapkute
0%
(
0 of
0)
1st Serve %
73%
(
8 of
11)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
0%
(
0 of
0)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
0%
(
0 of
0)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
0%
(
0 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
0%
(
0 of
0)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
5
Total Points Won
6
|
7-6(6) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Iveta Dapkute
Player
Edda Mamedova
69%
(
72 of
105)
1st Serve %
60%
(
72 of
121)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
58%
(
42 of
72)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
42 of
72)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
18 of
49)
45%
(
10 of
22)
Break Points Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
46%
(
48 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
61 of
121)
118
Total Points Won
108
|
6-7(2) 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anna Siskova
Player
Iveta Dapkute
77%
(
34 of
44)
1st Serve %
50%
(
21 of
42)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
62%
(
21 of
34)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
4 of
21)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
39%
(
17 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
55
Total Points Won
31
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sofia Shapatava
Player
Iveta Dapkute
63%
(
26 of
41)
1st Serve %
62%
(
21 of
34)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
10 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
53
Total Points Won
22
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Iveta Dapkute
Player
Gina Marie Dittmann
49%
(
18 of
37)
1st Serve %
74%
(
23 of
31)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
67%
(
12 of
18)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
37%
(
7 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
49%
(
18 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
37
Total Points Won
31
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Sana Garakani Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Zhibek Kulambayeva
Player
Sana Garakani
63%
(
34 of
54)
1st Serve %
61%
(
40 of
66)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
13
65%
(
22 of
34)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
41%
(
22 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
39 of
66)
71
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-1 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Andrea Cabio
Player
Sana Garakani
49%
(
32 of
65)
1st Serve %
62%
(
37 of
60)
-
Aces
-
9
Double Faults
7
50%
(
16 of
32)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
52%
(
34 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
32 of
60)
63
Total Points Won
62
|
6-2 2-6 10-6 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-0 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Emmanuelle Girard
Player
Sana Garakani
52%
(
28 of
54)
1st Serve %
54%
(
36 of
67)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
13
64%
(
18 of
28)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
9 of
31)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
41%
(
22 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
37 of
67)
69
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sana Garakani
Player
Justine Bretnacher
50%
(
32 of
64)
1st Serve %
69%
(
47 of
68)
1
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
1
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
31 of
47)
69%
(
22 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
19 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
25 of
68)
70
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 3-6 10-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 3-6 7-5 10-6 | H2H | |||
view more
Where To Watch Dapkute vs Garakani?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Dapkute Vs Garakani is now available here.
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 53% (105/93) | Win/Loss | 30% (21/50) |
| 52% (226/208) | Sets Win/Loss | 31% (49/107) |
| 51% (2017/1950) | Games Win/Loss | 40% (552/814) |
| 0.05 | Aces Per Game | 0.02 |
| 89 | Aces Total | 11 |
| 0.29 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.34 |
| 557 | Total Double Faults | 228 |
| 1:9:57 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 402.24 | Average Opponent Rank | 309.06 |
| 63% (5590/8861) | 1st Serve % | 51% (742/1450) |
| 55% (3089/5590) | 1st Serve Win % | 51% (378/742) |
| 42% (1362/3271) | 2nd Serve Win % | 33% (236/708) |
| 49% (589/1201) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (47/105) |
| 47% (4318/9106) | Return Points Win % | 38% (491/1302) |
| 54% (105/196) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 29% (20/70) |
| 0% (0/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 49% (18/37) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 38% (3/8) |
| 61% (22/36) | Deciding Set Win % | 47% (7/15) |
| 94% (101/95) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (18/16) |
| 6% (101/6) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (18/2) |
| 10% (97/10) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 9% (53/5) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
